Rahul Gandhi Demands Restoration of Expunged Lok Sabha Speech Portions

Key Highlights

  • Rahul Gandhi’s Demand: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has written to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, demanding the restoration of the expunged parts of his maiden speech as the Leader of the Opposition.
  • Accusations of Selective Expunction: Gandhi accused the Speaker of carrying out “selective expunction” and claimed the action was against Lok Sabha rules.


Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has expressed strong discontent over the expunction of significant portions of his speech in the Lok Sabha. In a letter addressed to Speaker Om Birla, Gandhi has called for the restoration of the removed sections, asserting that the expunction was selective and against parliamentary rules.

Details of the Letter

Accusation of Selective Expunction

Gandhi highlighted a perceived inconsistency in the expunction process, pointing out that a speech by Anurag Thakur, which contained numerous allegations, saw only one word expunged. He expressed confusion and disappointment over the selective nature of the expunction.

Speaker’s Action Against Lok Sabha Rules

The Rae Bareli MP argued that the Speaker’s action contravened Lok Sabha rules, particularly Rule 380. He asserted that the removed portions of his speech did not fall under the criteria for expunction outlined in this rule.

Freedom of Speech

Gandhi emphasized the constitutional right to freedom of speech for every member of the House, as enshrined in Article 105(1) of the Constitution of India. He argued that members should be free to voice the concerns of their constituents on the floor of the House without undue censorship.

Rahul Gandhi’s Position

Gandhi contended that his speech reflected the ground reality and factual positions that are important for the collective voice of the people. He urged the Speaker to reconsider the expunction and restore the removed portions to maintain the integrity of parliamentary proceedings.


Rahul Gandhi’s demand for the restoration of expunged speech portions underscores ongoing tensions in parliamentary procedures and the importance of upholding the right to freedom of speech within the legislative framework. The outcome of this demand will likely impact future parliamentary debates and the perception of fairness in the expunction process.

Post navigation

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

If you like this post you might alo like these